data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c16c6/c16c6321e9ea59fda0d732daa4644c9766674063" alt="Waves tracks"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63b03/63b035258bb7bbde2e4e48b6ca911c3166dcf2ad" alt="waves tracks waves tracks"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5d45/a5d456ab4b14d020ac2b497c6850f14d234cbb64" alt="waves tracks waves tracks"
With Reaper, I like that I can have a redundant secondary recording path, in case a hard drive fails, etc. And I really like that it has a system lock feature to prevent you from accidentally stopping the recording. My primary need is to have a reliable clean recording!!!įrom my experience so far, I like that Waves Tracks is fairly straight forward. Not mixing! I will give the tracks to the band and they'll give it to their studio guy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee7ad/ee7ad2dfef67a4e6547fd6f78e92a200c621252a" alt="waves tracks waves tracks"
Please keep in mind that I will be using the DAW strictly for recording. I was wondering if you guys have a preference between Reaper and Waves Tracks. I typically use Reaper for my recording needs, however, I've been looking into Waves Tracks, as I hear that a lot of FOH guys are using it for simple recording and playback for virtual sound check. I have a gig in couple weeks where I am mixing front of house as well as multi-track recording up to 32 channels out of the console.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c16c6/c16c6321e9ea59fda0d732daa4644c9766674063" alt="Waves tracks"